Tracking Calories? Know These 5 Reasons They’re Not All Created Equal.

With nutrition, it seems like nothing’s ever simple. Take the relationship among calories consumed, calories burned and impact on your weight.

This seems simple: if calories-in are greater than calories-burned, then you gain weight. If “in” < “burned,” then you lose weight. But wait! This simple view is misleading…there are good calories and bad calories, and from the standpoint of managing your weight these are NOT equal. Let’s walk through the facts here and consider what it means for your quest to get (or stay) reasonably lean.

by

With nutrition, it seems like nothing’s ever simple. Take the relationship among calories consumed, calories burned and impact on your weight.

This seems simple. If calories-in > calories-burned, then you gain weight. If “in” < “burned,” then you lose weight.

But wait! This simple view is misleading. There are good calories and bad calories, and from the standpoint of managing your weight these are NOT equal.

Let’s walk through the facts here and consider what it means for your quest to get (or stay) reasonably lean.

KEEPING “WEIGHT MANAGEMENT” IN LARGER “HEALTH” CONTEXT

We’ll mainly talk about weight here. But just briefly, let’s stipulate that “impact on your weight” is not at all the only relevant perspective on calories.

For heart health, brain health, avoiding the ever-more-common diabetes – even avoiding certain cancers – where a calorie comes from matters so much. A calorie from lean proteins, healthy fats, or good-for-you carbs is way better than one from refined sugars, white flour, high-saturated fat stuff (or alcohol, man).

So resist the temptation to reduce “nutrition” to only a numerical focus on “weight management,” man. I doubt anyone sets out to do that, but the calorie-counting feature of many fitness apps can subtly put you into that mindset. As in “I’ll eat more fiber tomorrow…today, I’m just focused on making sure I don’t take in too many calories.”

FOR WEIGHT MANAGEMENT: 5 WAYS CALORIES ARE NOT ALL EQUAL

With this overall-health reminder out of the way, let’s talk about calories and our weight. Here are five reasons why not all calories should “count” the same for you.

1. Calorie absorption rates differ among foods

Certain good-for-you foods pass through your body without 100% of their label-listed calories getting absorbed. Calories from peanuts, almonds and pistachios – and some high-fiber vegetables – have been shown to not be 100% absorbed.

Vegetables are low-cal anyway, though, so the real story here is nuts. Studies show consumption of nuts, even though they’re high-calorie, is not associated with being overweight. And nuts also bring many of the other good-calorie benefits listed below.

2. Some calories make you feel fuller for longer

Foods that keep you “sated” make it a lot easier to actually stay within your target daily calories. Proteins, high-fiber carbs and healthy fats all do this.

Two guys might both eat a 750-calorie breakfast, for example. But one guy is starving by mid-morning while the other guy cruises through until lunch time without those pangs. The starving guy might snack (office candy or doughnut, anyone?). And/or he might hit lunchtime in ravenous mode, which often leads to eating too much.

3. Many “bad” calories also create a craving impulse and habitual behavior

Sugars and refined flour don’t keep you feeling full for as long. On top of that, they create a “craving” dynamic in your brain’s pleasure centers. This double-whammy of bad calories is especially true for sugar.

You might think saying “addicted” is an exaggeration. But behavioral scientists say a sugar habit has some similarities to alcohol or drug dependencies. The more-primitive parts of the brain begin to associate a “reward” (the sugar pleasure sensation) with a “cue” (e.g. you walk into the coffee shop and smell pastries)…and a “habit” is formed. This makes it even more likely you’ll struggle to stay within whatever calorie-limit you try to enforce. Today, and tomorrow…etc.

4. “Good” calories” give you more sustained energy

This is a corollary to the “full for longer” benefit. When you eat these good things, it’s more likely you’ll work out that day since you’ll have more energy. It’s also more likely you’ll work out with a decent level of intensity, rather than just go through the motions.

So now, not only is your calories-in likely to be lower, but your calorie burn may be higher by eating good calories vs. bad ones.

5. Lean proteins also help grow, keep or lessen the decline of muscle

Having more muscle mass means that for any given age, weight and activity-level, your “base” metabolic rate will be higher. You’ll burn more calories just by being alive that day, if you’ve got more muscle!

If you’re interested in what aging does to our metabolic rate, and how exercise can overcome that rate’s natural decline, read this. Since they help sustain muscle…a calorie from chicken, fish or a lean cut of beef is contributing to your longer-term metabolic rate — unlike that muffin.

CONCLUSIONS

So let’s put this all together.

Eating good calories:

  • Sometimes, we absorb fewer of them vs. the label-listed amount
  • We snack and overeat less, since good calories keep us full longer and don’t drive cravings
  • We have more energy to work out and thus burn more calories
  • We’re more likely to have muscle mass that helps keep metabolic rate up

If counting calories is part of a discipline formula that works for you, I’m not here to say you shouldn’t do it! But for all the reasons discussed here, make them healthy calories, dude. And maybe, over time, you won’t have to think numerically so much. And of course, you’ll be healthier in a number of ways.

 

“You don’t look different, but you have changed. I’m looking through you, you’re not the same.” (The Beatles, I’m Looking Through You – click to listen)

You may also like

article-image
Nutrition & Recipes

Despite “Confusing” Science, THESE Nutrition “North Stars” Are Clear

The Atlantic Monthly recently published an article entitled “New Nutrition Study Changes Nothing (Why the science of healthy eating appears confusing—but isn’t).” The author makes the point that media businesses, in their quest for audience, have incentives to depict never-ending new revelations and controversies in nutrition.

Granted, there are some fundamental reasons why “definitive” nutrition science remains elusive. And there are legitimate different points of view on some nutrition questions. Like the prominence of carbs in your diet or whether certain fats are good or bad for you. So I don’t advocate ignoring the topic of nutrition entirely, man.

But at the same time, I want to do my part to reinforce this truth: There are a few clear Nutrition Do’s and Don’ts you should follow starting with your next meal, man. Don’t let uncertainties or controversies elsewhere in Nutrition Land interfere with that.

article-image
Health & Medicine , Nutrition & Recipes

Supplements? Don’t Just Ensure “Enough”…Beware of “Too Much” (Here’s How)

Do you take vitamins/minerals or other supplements? If so, you’re probably much more familiar with “RDA” (recommended, or reference, daily allowance) than “UL.”

UL’s stands for Upper Limits. They’re defined by the National Institute of Health as “the highest level of nutrient intake that is likely to pose no risk of adverse health effects for almost all individuals in the general population.”

With many foods now being fortified, and OlderBeast readers likely taking a multi-vitamin/mineral…you’re probably getting your RDAs. (Though if you don’t use dairy products and don’t take supplements, be wary of a potential Vitamin D need you may not be meeting).

But what about TOO MUCH of a vitamin or mineral? While some smart people argue UL’s for some things are too conservative, to me, you should at least know if you’re near / above UL’s. You can then learn more and decide what to do about it.

article-image
Fitness Planning & Gear , Nutrition & Recipes

Your Pig Day — Surprising Key to Long-term Nutrition Discipline

Eating well for life is partly about having a sound and practical plan, and (even more) about following that plan. We shouldn’t discount the importance of the “plan” part. So many “diets” or “programs” are harder to stick to than they need to be (or have a cost level few can sustain for the 10-20,000 days of living and eating we OlderBeasts have in front of us).

But this post is about the second challenge – following the plan. Let’s start with two premises:

1. We are all going to “cheat” vs. any plan sometimes (for me, that’s pizza and ice cream)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.